April 11, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If the boom was comparable to any in history why hasn’t the bust been comparable to any history?
In 1982 the SEC passed a new rule that allowed corporate America to readily buy back shares. In the 1980s new 401K laws (see Revenues Act of 1978 (enacted in 1980), and Tax Reform Act of 1984) were passed to bolster stocks and give corporate America tax breaks. Following the 1987 crash the PPT was born and circuit breakers were installed, and during the 1990s new technological platforms were implemented to increase market efficiencies. Suffice it to say, not only did these types of changes help capital move into stocks during the bull, but they have also helped ensure that capital has not swiftly move out of stocks during the bear. Optimism Is America’s Greatest Asset. But how do we define ‘optimism’? It is becoming increasingly apparent that the demise of the U.S. financial markets will not emulate previous incidences of financial destruction. To be sure, nearly every major U.S. stock market bust, including the crash of 1837, numerous debacles during the late 1800s, and 1929, has been brought about in large part by the end of investor optimism. And while investor optimism is undoubtedly an important factor in today’s marketplace, it is how we choose to define ‘investor optimism’ that is critical. As a result of newly erected ‘market pillars’, during times of crisis companies can readily repurchase shares, and some 401K participants can not readily liquidate assets. Moreover, and as evidence that previous lessons have been learned, the Fed reacts more quickly to market declines and the threat of recession than ever before (sometimes even ‘pre-emptively’), the SEC is ready to change rules within minutes, and the government is prepared to bailout countries (Brazil) and companies (Airlines). Whatever you choose to call it -- faith in the dollar, optimism in American – the U.S. financial markets are guarded by a labyrinth of complex forces. To borrow Poole’s words, its these ‘well understood mechanisms’ – not merely a simplistic interpretation that when ‘long-term interest rates’ decline stocks should rise – which allow investors to remain confident in the system. The Reality of Stock Market Confidence It is a fundamental reality that stock prices are overvalued. This is true whether you care to look at historical market valuations (P/E, P/B) or at a U.S. economy that is not expected to perform strongly, but is expected to grow with more risk (increases in debt as a % GDP, etc). However, it is important to recognize that the structure of the markets was not designed to reflect reality. Rather, today’s U.S. stock markets are structured – referring to how capital moves into and out of stocks and why – with the explicit intent to avoid previous financial catastrophes, and perhaps also to keep prices artificially high. More than 40% of today’s trading volume is derived from program trades, hedge funds attempt to play the markets without risking naked (unhedged) capital, and due to regulatory confinements equity fund managers must invest a certain amount of their available capital. Strangely enough, liquidity and volatility -- two things that have nothing to do with the intrinsic value of a company – are what make U.S. equity markets the envy of the world and to Institutional speculators. Yes, pension funds, 401Ks, mutual funds, private investors, etc. are the (relatively dormant) capital base of the markets – and the current sentiment the holders of these assets have could be looked at to figure out ‘investor optimism’. Nevertheless, when Wall Street, Braverman, or Poole comment on ‘the markets’ or argue that they are ‘optimistic’, they are not necessarily reflecting what investors think about current stock prices. Rather, they look to predict when the net influx of sidelined investor capital will roll into stocks, when the next tax cut will help the economy, and when future corporate earnings might justify current stock market overvaluation. In short, the reality is that confidence in ‘the markets’ is not the same thing as arguing ‘stocks are undervalued’. Conclusion The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 increased the amount of money participants can punch into 401Ks. The Fed will likely continue to cut interest rates, print money, and buy/sell Treasurys (stocks). The government has already cut taxes and is looking to do so again. These types of actions are why the U.S. stock market bust has not yet turned into the biggest bust of all time. However, U.S. history has proven that sooner or later stocks reflect the underlying fundamentals of companies. And while it is difficult to foresee exactly where the next structural crack will emerge (i.e. pension funds allocating less capital to equities), we can nonetheless speculate that, ‘on average’, the stock markets have a greater chance of declining so long as the U.S. economy and corporate earnings remain in a funk. In sum, the ‘bust’ period is ongoing -- it may take a substantial amount of time before the optimists are right. By contrast, thanks to a market supported by optimism in liquidity, volatility, and an overvalued U.S. dollar (which, if it continues to decline, will limit the amount of stimulus the Fed and government can provide) it may only take a short period of time for this confidence to be lost. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All data and information within these pages is thought to be taken from reliable sources but there is no guarantee as such. All opinions expressed on this site are opinions and should not be regarded as investment advice. |